This doesn't exactly count as
Letters from Jerks, first of all because many of these people do not
belong in the Jerk category, but this was the best place I could think to put it.
Well you all remember my post What’s Love Got
to do with it? And the debacle it seemed to create over at
blogcritics.org. Yes the pissiness did
tend to fog up my soliloquy, but it has since been sanitized for your
protection. Not my article, but all the
nasty comments were wiped clean and covered with a lovely white wash
coating. Thus expunging the records of
all those who participated in my ridicule.
It just occurred to me to make
this much more understandable and a bit more fair, here's my brand new
spanky improved sanitized version: http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/31/075001.php
And now all I feel is conflicted. One thing I know for sure is my talent at
rallying the salivating mob and turning them against each other. I’m like one of those annoying Sci-Fi
characters; once they enter into a city the townsfolk begin fighting amongst
themselves. The mildest of mannered
become blood thirsty, savage beasts. You
know anyone else with this influence and ability to send people into a
frenzy? Celebrities don’t count as I
don’t have an army of P.R. personnel backing me.
It’s only me.
You’ve heard it before, I never delete an
email and now it’s time to recreate those comment logs; the good, the bad, and
unbelievably hideous.
Comment 1
posted by John Matthews on May 31, 2005 04:29 PM:
I think you can find all of the answers to
your problems here.
Comment 2
posted by Brooke Lee on May 31, 2005 05:17 PM:
Wow, you’re an idiot.
Comment 3
posted by Temple Stark on May 31, 2005 05:53 PM:
Thanks for the post Brooke.
I won't attempt anything trite at the moment
(I'll wait some and then trite away :-) ) - but thanks for posting.
Comment 4
posted by Temple Stark on May 31, 2005 05:55 PM:
Well I did just
look at your pics at your site - the smile is always there. That's refreshing.
Comment 5
posted by Bennett on May 31, 2005 07:09 PM:
Hey Brooke, just got back from your site. Had
a lot of fun there, some poignant observations. Have you really gotten into a
tub with ice in it?
Anyway, welcome to BC. I'm looking forward to
more of your irreverence.
Flirting? Hell, I used to flirt with
everyone. Now I flirt when the doll girl isn't looking. She's a sensitive sort.
No go at the dating web site? :-) don't blame you.
The Amsterdam
concept would be good for a blog or two, but what to do with the poor whipped
bastards once you get done?
cheers!
Comment 6
posted by Nicolette Rivers on May 31, 2005 07:55 PM:
Hi, I tried to comment on your blog (non-BC
blog) and I couldn't figure out how to register. Ya don't make it easy! :
Comment 7
posted by Brooke Lee on May 31, 2005 08:03 PM:
Oh they say you have to register but I have
it set so folks can comment anonymously. You can just ignore that Login and
Password crap and comment to your heart's content -- it'll show up.
Comment 8
posted by Nicolette Rivers on May 31, 2005 08:08 PM:
Too late...I registered!
Comment 9
posted by Katharine Donelson on June 1, 2005 01:38 AM:
Until quite recently, I totally thought
flirting was just something you did for fun. I didn't think it had an actual
purpose. This was a great post, I really enjoyed reading it.
Comment 10
posted by Lono on June 1, 2005 03:23 AM:
was going to read this post until I saw how
dreadfully long it was. Society has warped my fragile mind, and I can't handle
any points made outside of a 5 paragraph setting.
funny, everyone told me quitting English
after 8th grade would hurt me in the end.
Comment 11
posted by Brooke Lee on June 1, 2005 03:42 AM:
Yes it was a dreadfully long post. I often
pass by long posts myself, but suddenly my attention span becomes completely
focused when the entire article is about me.
Comment 12
posted by Victor Plenty on June 1, 2005 02:54 PM:
Keen irony, those stick-figure thin people on
that book cover. But leaving that aside, thanks for the interesting
observations, Brooke.
Sometimes I think about my life as if it were
a novel, and wonder what I'd have to do for anybody to read it. Trust me,
nobody would ever want to read about what I actually do all day. If I were my
own biographer I'd have to fictionalize my story. Spice it up. Make the main
character do something interesting! It almost doesn't matter what it is.
Anything!
Then I realize: hey! I am my own biographer!
I'm the author of my life, goshdarnit! I could make the main character do something
interesting today, right now, this very moment.
I could charm my way into a business office
and cut a million-dollar deal.
I could stride into the halls of government
and start a reform movement destined to sweep the nation.
I could slide into a club and ask out the
most attractive person there.
But then I realize my lunch break is over, so
I get back to work.
Comment 13
posted by Dawn on June 1, 2005 04:46 PM:
Charisma and charm can't be hidden by excess
baggage.
Good post, thanks for sharing Brooke.
Comment 14
posted by S L Cunningham on June 1, 2005 06:37 PM:
Now I know why I don't go on blind dates.
Comment 15
posted by HW Saxton on June 1, 2005 07:07 PM:
There really isn't much excuse for being
fat."Big boned": Everyone knows that
is
nonsense. Pleasingly plump: It's great
if you're talking about Seven Rib roast,
otherwise there's no such thing. Slower
metabolism:Again,largely false. Cases of
this being attributable to obesity are
far and few in between.Glandular probs:
As big a fallacy as "Slow
Metabolism"
ask any dietician. Sorry to say but fat
just ain't attractive on any body! Fact
is it's plain disgusting. Sorry to be an
offense to all the people that have to
use a rag on a stick to wash those hard
to reach places you have to buy Gold
ond for but...
Mostly, people just need to eat less,eat
better and get off the couch and do some
exercise. America is full of fat people
that are just plain lazy ass. But aside
from the French most European countries
have more than fair share of fat folks.
They like to point the finger at the US
as head of the pack in this category but
I spent three years living in Europe
when I was in the service and almost all
of the countries I visited had as many
fatties as we do in the US. In Germany,
maybe even more. Almost understandable
given the quality of das bier but still
it can be exercised away.
Comment 16
posted by Temple Stark on June 1, 2005 07:22 PM:
And there really isn't any excuse for posting
that here. C'mon man - you just want to make someone feel bad. (rhetorical)
That's a pretty low goal.
Brooke already knows 430 is waaay too much.
What would you say was fat? What is skinny?
Yep, exercise is one solution. But it doesn't
work the same for everyone. Some people DO burn it off much much faster. Or
burn it off so much they never gain anything. My step-dad's entire family is
like that. Tiny, not rail thin but extremely thin. My step-sister is 40 - and she looks maybe 15, in height and size
and everything. My two other step-sisters are almost exactly the same, though
older looking.
Why wouldn't the reverse be true that it does
not burn away as quickly - in some cases.
I'm a big advocate of exercise and do believe
it is the No. 1 solution to most people's weight problems here in the US (that and
smaller portions and a respect for food). But it doesn't work the same for
anybody. (For those who care -- 6-5,
220).
Comment 17
posted by Brooke Lee on June 1, 2005 07:23 PM:
Why H.W. that's brilliant! You've solved all our problems! Because obviously that's exactly what this
was post about.
You poor, shallow, ignorant tit. Did ya poke yer eye out after this post?
Comment 18
posted by Dawn on June 1, 2005 07:44 PM:
HW - health issues aside (and most
assuredly Brooke is aware of these) what excuse do you have for leaving a
loathsome, ignorant douche bag of a comment like that?
We don't make a habit of being assholes to
new BC's, but since your and old jerk who clearly doesn't have a clue, I will
make an exception in your case.
Dude, your comment sucked dead rat dicks.
Comment 19
posted by HW Saxton on June 1, 2005 08:49 PM:
Dawn, Rest assured it was not a
personal
attack on any one person. Excuse me for
speaking honestly and openly,I knew that
I was gonna get hung up by the nuts for
being truthful. Ah well....
Political correctness is often just a
diaper load.Hypocritical BS in this case
I feel. I'll betcha laugh at fat jokes
though dontcha ? Thought so.
I find fat people to be gross esp.since
I have to look at them everyday,have to
deal with being crammed next to them on
subways and planes,even smell them in an
extreme case scenario. I guess it\'s just
a bit of a pet peeve with me. If they
don't like middle aged guys that keep up
a healthy diet,work out and are fat free
then that's cool by me.
I find it apalling, generally, that the
"Vertically Challeged" are so lazy
that
they dislike themselves to the point of
that they would abuse their bodies this
way. The body is a temple not a trough.
My main point even though it was stated
meanly (HONESTLY) was that most cases of
obesity are largely preventable and are
self wrought as opposed to being medical
conditions. I think it is a disease of
the soul like most drug addictions are
and I think it should be addressed in a
similar manner. Psychological issues and
physical issues treated simultaneously.
My goal was not to purposely stomp all
over anyone's feelings. To any and all
of those whom I offended I APOLOGIZE to
you.
For those of you who feel that I need to
be further lambasted. Have at it. Thanx.
Comment 20
posted by Brooke Lee on June 1, 2005 09:02 PM:
Now H.W. tell the truth puddin; your only
agenda was to wave your withered old penis in the air for all to see, while
handing out archaic information that we've all heard from various sources time
and time again.
You didn't just catapult us into a wealth of
knowledge; instead you just dribbled on your chin a lil. Here's a napkin for ya.
Comment 21
posted by RJ on June 1, 2005 9:23 PM:
Look. I like big chicks. 5' 6" and 175
pounds won't scare me away, as long as she's got a personality and a
deep...mind.
But 430???
Baby, I mean this in the nicest possible way:
YOU NEED TO LOSE WEIGHT!
Like, if you don't, you'll die.
Now, to be crude, how does one even have
penetrative sexual intercourse with a woman over 300 pounds?
Don't blame your dearth of a love life on
anything but the root cause: YOU.
Yes, losing weight is hard. But so is
carrying around over 400 pounds!
Drop a couple hundred, and I'm sure you'll
have guys a-plenty...
Comment 22
posted by Nicolette River on June 1, 2005 10:16 PM:
**If they
don't like middle aged guys that keep up
a healthy diet,work out and are fat free
then that's cool by me.**
Unless you're a yogurt -- or a skeleton in a high school classroom, I don't
think that's actually possible.
Even the Olsen Twins aren't fat free.
Comment 23
posted by Bennett on
June 1, 2005 10:27 PM:
Eric has a twin?
Comment 24
posted by Nicolette Rivers on June 1, 2005 10:37 PM:
No -- twin sisters. He sponges off their Full
House fortune.
Comment 25
posted by ElBicho on June 1, 2005 10:56 PM:
HW and RJ,
>From both your comments, I can't tell if
you guys are fucking assholes or fucking idiots. Probably both, but you can't get mad because
I\'m being honest about how I feel, right.
This young woman opens herself up and allows
us an inside look at her world, and you two dimwits come along and trash her
for no reason. If you don't like fat
people, why did you read a post about a fat chick? Nowhere did I see that she asked for anyone's
opinion on what she could do about her condition, or what you thought of obese
people.
"it was not a personal attack on any one
person."
You're right it's a personal attack on many
people. That makes it so much
better. I find it appalling that you
can\'t spell or write comments that fill the page.
You are both an embarrassment to the site and
mankind. Sorry, but I find rude,
ignorant, willfully hurtful people kind of gross.
Comment 26 posted
by Brooke Lee on June 2, 2005 12:22 AM:
Ya know after I posted this I wondered if it
was a mistake; it was so bloody raw and open.
It looked completely out place amongst all the Bigfoot sightings and
updates on the Michael Jackson's trial.
Then when the only reply I got was suggesting
a fat folks dating service, I knew I'd buggered up.
But I was wrong; many people looked past the
glaring title of this post and discovered something else. Saw what I saw? Maybe.
Found something else? Could
be. Was truly enlightened and hopes to
worship me for all eternity? Gosh I sure
hope so.
Some folks had differencing opinions, and I
personally quite enjoyed my banter with H.W.
I'm not hurt. My God to be so thin skinned after all this
time, I never possibly coulda made it through life so far. When you slit yourself open for the entire
world to see, not everyone is going to enjoy it nor be able to handle it.
Anyways for the folks who took the time to
visit my personal site; you know I'm no longer 430. :)
Comment 27
posted by HW Saxton on June 2, 2005 12:33 AM:
Brooke, this "withered old penis" hasn't
ever seen the inside of a fat sow such
as you and it never will.I don't"do" fat
broads.There are lotsa chubby chasers. I
am sure if you look hard enough ya might
just find one who would even fuck some
porcine beast such as yourself. I tried
to apologize but can only do it once,it
lacks sincerity after that. Whether or
not you chose to accept bothers me not
a bit. In fact it'll give me something
to pine over on these long hot summer
nights. I'm just shattered.
But hey there Petunia... Well, batteries
ARE cheap. Cheaper than getting a man
drunk enough to make the sign of the two
backed beast with YOU anyway.
If you do manage to get a man into bed
without rolling over on him and crushing
him to death,remember this: Just be sure
to coat youself good with flour so that
when he rolls you over all he has to do
is look for a wet spot. Now go,my little
twinkie of love, Haagen Daazs waits for
no one. But,things are not as bad as it
may seem. You can always get yourself
some part time work and make extra $$$
modeling tents.
El Bicho,You spineless bitch. Let me be
a little less than eloquent with you OK?
Go fuck yourself in the ass. That's it.
Y\'all win, I know when I've been licked,
all over. Later guys, it's been fun...
PS: Brooke is it true that your ass is
so big that it has little asses going in
orbit around it?
Comment 28
posted by Nicolette Rivers on June 2, 2005 12:36 AM:
That's right. There's always someone who
wants you to define your happiness and worth by their standards. There's no
point in giving them the satisfaction.
I believe the expression which says living
well is the best revenge.
Comment 29
posted by Brooke Lee on June 2, 2005 12:47 AM:
Since H.W. just tossed his dignity out the window, let us
say farewell while he strolls away as a martyr, proudly showing off his wounds;
for that\'s all he has left. Well that and his "temple".
Comment 30
posted by Victor Plenty on June 2, 2005 12:55 AM:
RJ and HW, you've both been insufferably rude
here.
This is a post about flirting. Your comments
might have been welcome and useful if you could have bothered to offer some
advice on how to improve one's flirting technique. There's no excuse for your
insulting and condescending tangents about weight loss and health risks. You
really think you\'re the first ones to mention those points to any overweight
person reading this? Get yourselves some frickin' clues, fellas.
Oh, and trying to hide behind your bullshit
whining about "political correctness" only demonstrates the inherent
weakness of your faulty attempts at logic.
This was never a matter of political
correctness. This is all about common courtesy and civility, a standard you
have both failed to uphold.
Nobody is asking you to date people you don't
find attractive, guys. If you're that shallow, and blind to what really matters
in a partner, it's your loss. You're merely being asked to keep your tasteless
and pointless cruelty down to a dull roar.
Comment 31
posted by El Bicho on June 2, 2005 1:01 AM:
Awwww, did I strike a nerve? "Rest assured," HW, "it was
not a personal attack on any one person. Excuse me for speaking honestly and
openly." I had no idea your feeling
would be hurt, considering how callous you are towards others. I was standing up for a stranger that you
maliciously insulted when the editors just let it slide. How on earth is that "spineless"? To quote Inigo Montoya, "I do not think
it means what you think it means."
P.S. you should keep your gay fantasies to
yourself before the Christian swarm descends upon you.
Get cancer!
Comment 32
posted by Dave Nalle on June 2, 2005 1:20 AM:
Wow, I knew HW had a screw loose, but I never
expected something like this to set him so totally off the deep end. I think RJ was just trying to express concern
in an inept way, so give him a break.
And Brooke, I went to and enjoyed your site,
and given that you're not currently svelte, you don't look bad at all. I actually have an acquaintance about your
size who's not nearly as pretty who recently got married and had her first
kid. She dropped quite a bit of weight
for before getting pregnant, but then gained most of it back in the inevitable
process. Her husband, of course, is
virtually two-dimensional, but a nice guy.
As for flirting, it's all just talking to
people. Don't think of it as flirting,
think of it as just chatting. It's not
about sex, it's not about being 'cute' or getting attention, it's just about
expressing your personality and finding out a little about the other
person. Plus, it's harmless and never
has to go any farther than you want it to.
Plus, practice makes perfect.
Dave
Comment 33
posted by bhw on June 2, 2005 1:22 AM:
I deleted the one that got most personal. It
just takes a few minutes for the page to rebuild.
Comment 34
posted by El Bicho on June 2, 2005 1:25 AM:
"Now, to be crude, how does one even have penetrative
sexual intercourse with a woman over 300 pounds?"
Dave, do you really want me to believe a statement like that is inept
concern? It's a post about being awkward in regards to flirting.
Comment 35
posted by Eric Berlin on June 2, 2005 1:25 AM:
Someone somewhere called out for the
(assumed) cool hand of an editor.
I don't even know where to start in this
hornet's nest. If I knock out one comment, where do I stop?
I'm asking openly here -- no agenda.
Perhaps the good E Olsen will have a look. It's
late and my head is fuzzy.
For now, I ask all to get their chill on and
play nice.
Comment 36
posted by HW Saxton on June 2, 2005 1:30 AM:
El Bicho,El Panoche Grande or whatever,
Strike a nerve ? No I'm just a tireless
crusader in the war on stupidity and I
fight my fights where they appear.If you
want to get into a battle of the wits,
come back after you've armed yourself.
It's no fun picking on the defenseless.
And for the record Dawn O. had already
spoke in behalf of Brooke.
La Bitcho,I had no idea whether you were
male or female,"El" not
withstanding as
many people choose online names that are
not reflective of who or what they are.
Oh,I suppose that I could re-address my
insult to be gender correct but it\'s a
little too late and this is getting old.
Gay fantasies?????????? You use that as
if it's a very insulting thing.Is there
something wrong with being gay??? It is
not MY style but there is not anything
wrong with that in my POV, but it is not
me.Funny isn't it,how your anger with me
brings out your dislike for gay folks.
YOU been hangin' with the fundies ?
Spineless,yes. I'd already apologized to
the parties involved of which I didn't
know you were one. So to kick after the
fact yes that lacks integrity especially
considering you were not involved.Hmmm..
"Get Cancer"? Is that the sequel to
"Get
Shorty"? I'm an Elmore Leonard fan but I
must say I've never read that one.
Comment 37
posted by Victor Plenty on June 2, 2005 1:30 AM:
Well, Eric (and Eric), I'll make no complaint
about the deletion of my comment #30 if it happens to become a bit confusing
because the offending earlier comments happen to just disappear for some
mysterious reason
Comment 38
posted by bhw on June 2, 2005 1:32 AM:
No worries, Victor, #30 is perfectly fine.
Comment 39
posted by Eric Berlin on June 2, 2005 1:33 AM:
Thanks bhw
Comment 40
posted by bhw on June 2, 2005 1:39 AM:
The comment policy is a goddamned joke.
Comment 41
posted by Eric Berlin on June 2, 2005 1:45 AM:
My thanks was entered before HW's latest
missive... so I wasn't trying to be snarky.
Comment 42
posted by bhw on June 2, 2005 1:47 AM:
Spineless,yes. I'd already apologized to the
parties involved of which I didn't know you were one. So to kick after the fact
yes that lacks integrity especially considering you were not involved.Hmmm.
Except that you ended your "apology"
with:
For those of you who feel that I need to be
further lambasted. Have at it. Thanx.
You got much less lambasting than what was
coming to you.
Comment 43
posted by bhw on June 2, 2005 1:50 AM:
I figured, Eric. Thanks.
Comment 44
posted by Victor Plenty on June 2, 2005 1:50 AM:
I worked very hard to keep my comments here
civil. Still, I\'d be quite glad to see all my words disappear from here, if
that's what it takes to also rid ourselves of childish insults from those who
whine about how icky they think it is, having to share the world with people
who happen to be black, or fat, or whatever other thing their brainless bigotry
leads them to disdain.
Comment 45
posted by Brooke Lee on June 2, 2005 2:00 AM:
Errr, maybe I shoulda posted something about
Bigfoot or Michael Jackson instead.
Comment 46
posted by bhw on June 2, 2005 2:02 AM:
Your hard work paid off, Victor. I'd rather not decimate the
entire thread, if I can avoid it, so I'm going to leave things the way they are
for now. If nothing else, this thread is a reminder that just because you
believe, say, there is "not anything wrong with" being gay, doesn't
mean you're not a bigot.
Comment 47
posted by bhw on June 2, 2005 2:04 AM:
Brooke, keep writing what you do and the way you do!
Comment 48
posted by Natalie Davis on June 2, 2005 2:24 AM:
I am focusing on the post and the post alone.
Ms. Lee, this would make an interesting book. Your observations and experiences
are fascinating and there is such heart and emotion within the words. I've not
see your picture yet, but it sounds like you are one beautiful woman to me.
Thank you for sharing this, and apologies for, well, you know. This is often a
sad place.
Comment 49
posted by El Bicho on June 2, 2005 2:28 AM:
So does that make you a stupid crusader? It's a battle you are sure to win because you
forget statements you make minutes apart.
You give the go-ahead for your lambasting and then you cry and whimper
like a panoche when it happens? If you
didn't mean it, you shouldn't have said it.
That's a lack of integrity, just like your disingenious apology to the
original poster.
If you actually had any wit, you could make
your insults gender-neutral, dumbass (see how I did that).
My reference to gay fantasy was not used in
an insulting way, but if that's the way you took it, that illustrates your
mindset no matter how much you protest.
I was just responding matter-of-factly when you wrote about me F'ing
myself and you getting licked by me.
When it's two men involved with each other, that's gay, regardless of
what your father, grandfather, brother, priest and gym teacher told you. Not wrong, but gay.
My anger brings out my dislike for you and
your immature antics and boorish nature, although the editors have allowed you
to appear better than your are.
If you are really a Leonard fan, might I
suggest you get "Out of Sight."
Comment 50
posted by Natalie Davis on June 2, 2005 2:34 AM:
Saw the photos and I was right: You *are*
beautiful.
Comment 51
posted by Dawn on June 2, 2005 8:41 AM:
Hey, anyone who has the brass ones to pony up
and apology is alright in my book. I was
kind of shocked that HW, who is notoriously *not* vicious, would leave such a
hurtful comment anyway.
Yes, Brooke, your post was indeed appropriate
for the site and I liked it very much.
Flirting is an artform and a dance, it's difficult to define and hard to
pin down. It takes time and effort to
figure it out and lots of people get it wrong - apparently you are good at it
in spite of your efforts to do otherwise.
Be proud - and of course you are lovely!
OH and RJ, diplomacy may not be your
"thing" but just go crawl in a hole, or apologize. Otherwise you will confirm all of out deepest
suspicions about your little "secret".
Comment 52
posted by bhw on June 2, 2005 8:47 AM:
The "apology" was bullshit, since
it contained more slurs and was followed by another comment that was beyond the
pale.
Comment 53
posted by Dawn on June 2, 2005 11:19 AM:
Yes, bhw et al, sadly I was able to view the
skanky comment from HW (after I left mine) and gives a rather false impression
about what happened.
Okay, this is a general comment to those who
are either members or just readers who leave comments. No man (or woman) is a fucking island here
and no one person can't be replaced.
While I hate to see people leave over petty disputes, I sure don't miss
a disgusting, mean-spirited, reprehensible, bigoted, cruel, hateful, useless,
shriveled little prick like HW Saxton who would level such an off topic
baseless attack on a fellow writer, especially one trying to be open and
honest.
That shit doesn't fucking fly. I will harass Eric endlessly until he hunts
the offender down and beats them to death with his bare hands. This isn't my site and don't try to run things
around here, but I will step up and right wrongs when I see them.
So fuck off Saxton and anyone who thinks
comments like his are appropriate. And don't come back until you can act like a
human, not a fucking ape.
No offense to apes.
G*ddamn people are fucking stupid asses.
Comment 54
posted by Eric Olsen on June 2, 2005 11:39 AM:
thanks Brooke and nothing but the best to you
Comment 55
posted by Eric Olsen on June 2, 2005 11:40 AM:
oh, and Bigfoot and Michael Jackson are
always excellent themes
Comment 56
posted by Brooke Lee on June 2, 2005 11:44 AM:
Oh don't hound Eric; I imagine the poor guy
got his share of email. No matter what there's always gonna be assholes.
I've tried to right the wrongs before;
sometimes I triumphed and sometimes I failed miserably. But if we didn't have
the occasional wrong in the world then we couldn't be so damn boastful when we
got something right. :)
I just didn't want it to look as though HW
was hobbling off like a wounded old man.
Comment 57
posted by Victor Plenty on June 2, 2005 10:17 PM:
Flirting is every bit as relevant here, in my
opinion, as all that other stuff about Bigfoot and Michael Jackson.
Just keep them separate, that's all I ask.
Flirting or Michael Jackson or Bigfoot = good
article! Read and enjoy!
Flirting and Michael Jackson, or flirting and
Bigfoot = bad article! Run for your life!
Comment 58
posted by Eric Berlin on June 2, 2005 10:24 PM:
Good use of Boolean operators...
Comment 59
posted by Cerulean on June 2, 2005 10:32 PM:
Welcome to Blogcritics. We could use more
females. Maybe you'd like my writing here. In case you can't find a link, try
cutting and pasting this:
http://blogcritics.org/author.php?author=Cerulean
Comment 60
posted by Dave Nalle on June 2, 2005 10:41 PM:
But flirting and mj and bigfoot might not be
so bad, eh? Might be just the harsh dose of reality jacko needs.
Dave
Comment 61
posted by Brooke Lee on June 2, 2005 11:10 PM:
I think Michael Jackson and Bigfoot should do
a Broadway Musical together and close with a brief rebuttal.